Lifetime Costs Of Light Bulbs

April 11th, 2010 Leave a reply »

Huddler Bobkart developed a formula for computing the total (tangible) cost of ownership of light bulbs that takes into account the initial cost of the bulb, its energy consumption, its light output, its lifetime length, and the cost of electricity. The full analysis and explanation is below, but we’ll start with the comparison of an incandescent, CFL, and LED lamp each with identical 800 Lumen output capabilities, but with vastly different initial cost, energy consumption, and lifetime length:

Up-front cost: $1

Lifetime cost: $8.75/megalumen-

15W/800 Lumen CFL

Up-front cost: $5.00

Lifetime cost: $3.43/megalumen-hour

7.5W/800 Lumen LED

Up-front cost: $100

Lifetime cost: $4.04/megalumen-hour
While CFL is the most cost-effective under current conditions, if the cost of an 800 lumen LED comes down even to $75, it makes economic sense.
How the Formula is Calculated
The formula gives dollars/megalumen-hour, and takes into account:

* initial-dollars: the initial cost of the bulb in dollars
* watts-consumed: how much power the bulb consumes in watts
* average-lumens: how much light it produces at any given time, on average over its lifetime, in lumens
* thousand-hours-lifetime: how long it lasts in thousands of hours
* dollars-per-kilowatt-hour: the cost of electricity in dollars per kilowatt-hour

If you understand that a kilowatt-hour is the consumption of one thousand watts for one hour, or one hundred watts for ten hours, etc., then you’ll understand the megalumen-hours concept too, it’s the generation of one million lumens for one hour, or one thousand lumens for one thousand hours, etc. In other words, its a way of measuring the total light output of the bulb over time, just as kilowatt-hours is a way of measuring the total energy consumed by the bulb over time.

dollars/megalumen-hour = ( initial-dollars + watts-consumed * dollars-per-kilowatt-hour * thousand-hours-lifetime) / ( average-lumens * thousand-hours-lifetime / 1000 )

Because both CFLs and LEDs slowly lose their brightness over their lifetime, “average lumens” were used assuming a 30% loss of brightness over a bulb’s lifetime. Thus, in the examples below, for CFLs and LED lamps, an average-lumens value of 85% of the so-called “initial-lumens” is used.

Here are some examples (all assuming $0.10/kilowatt-hour):

60-watt incandescent bulb, 800 lumens, 1,000 hours lifetime, $1.00 initial cost:

( $1.00 + 60 * $0.10 * 1 ) / ( 800 * 1 / 1000 ) = ( $1.00 + $6.00 ) / 0.8 = $8.75 / megalumen-hour

15-watt CFL bulb, 800 lumens (680 average), 6,000 hours lifetime, $5.00 initial cost:

( $5.00 + 15 * $0.10 * 6 ) / ( 680 * 6 / 1000 ) = ( $5.00 + $9.00 ) / 4.08 = $3.43 / megalumen-hour

7.5-watt LED lamp, 800 lumens (680 average), 50,000 hours lifetime, $100.00 initial cost:

( $100.00 + 7.5 * $0.10 * 50 ) / ( 680 * 50 / 1000 ) = ( $100.00 + $37.50 ) / 34 = $4.04 / megalumen-hour

Note that the CFL does come out a little better than the LED lamp in this case, but if the initial cost were dropped to more like $75.00, the LED lamp would start to have a better bottom line.

Note also that this formula does not consider less tangible factors like the cost of frequent changing of bulbs in difficult-to-access locations, or the cost to the environment of mercury escaping from improperly-disposed-of CFLs, or the additional CO2 that is put into the atmosphere to generate the extra electricity used by both incandescent bulbs and CFLs compared to LED lamps.

Advertisement

15 comments

  1. Good post, some fascinating details. I believe six of days ago, I have discovered a similar post.

  2. I find myself coming to your blog more and more often to the point where my visits are almost daily now!

  3. need to download and convert the following (permission was sent out by email), which has had me banging my head on my desk for hours now, as free and online converters are LOUSY for this type of thing

  4. Ben Chepiga says:

    Awesome post, very informative! can’t wait to read more, really loved it. I completely agree with you. You made some great points.

  5. WoW great Post, can’t wait to read more. I totally agree with what everyone else is saying in the other comments.

  6. Elna Gentges says:

    Hello, it is likely our posting might be off topic but anyhow, having gone surfing about your blog and it looks extremely cool. It’s obvious that you know your subject and you appear fervent about it. We are building a fresh blog plus I am struggling to make it look good, plus provide quality writing. I’ve gleaned much at this site and also I look forward to a lot more posts and will be coming back soon. I just wanted to say thanks. This article was recommended to me by a close friend. I have to say, looking at this article provided me with a lot of value. I will be sure to tell more friends about it and have them come here check it out and comment on it as well.

Leave a Reply